Plasma and Fusion Research
Volume 12, 1303005 (2017)
Letters
- Research Institute for Applied Mechanics, Kyushu University, 6-1 Kasuga-kouen, Kasuga, Fukuoka 816-8580, Japan
- 1)
- National Institute for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, 2-166 Omotedate, Obuchi, Rokkasho, Aomori 039-3212, Japan
Abstract
Distributed instabilities can successively change one after another to give accelerated radial propagation. The response of the linearly unstable distributed instabilities is identified in a gradual evolution phase as well as in a phase just after impact of modulation. Global nonlinear simulations of drift-interchange modes in helical plasmas are carried out with source modulation using a reduced MHD model. Conditional average of long time-series data with the modulation period reveals characteristic responses of the plasma. Smaller-scale variations comparable to the micro-temporal scale in this simulation are also included in the gradual evolution phase. The correlation analysis shows that the evolution of the mean pressure is strongly correlated with the strength of the nonlinear coupling. The evaluation of the energy balance to decompose the energy transfer into contribution from each three-wave coupling clarifies that a single mode coupling at each location has the dominant contribution to the smaller-scale pressure evolution in spite of self-organized mechanism with a wide range of comparable magnitude modes. Comparison of mode amplitudes does not define the dominant one, so identification of the active mode is useful for understanding the causality. This selection suggests the mechanism that gives the spreading effective in the quasi-steady state as for the ballistic propagation in the self-organized critical state.
Keywords
turbulence spreading, self-organization, global simulation, nonlinear coupling, energy transfer, source modulation, torus plasma
Full Text
References
- [1] K. Ida et al., Nucl. Fusion 55, 013022 (2015).
- [2] K. Gentle et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3620 (1995).
- [3] P. Mantica, P. Galli, G. Gorini, G.M.D. Hogeweij, J. de Kloe, N.J. Lopes Cardozo and RTP Team, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 5048 (1999).
- [4] S. Inagaki et al., Nucl. Fusion 53, 113006 (2013).
- [5] N. Tamura et al., Nucl. Fusion 47, 449 (2007).
- [6] S. Inagaki et al., Nucl. Fusion 54, 114014 (2014).
- [7] N. Kasuya, S. Sugita, S. Inagaki, K. Itoh, M. Yagi and S.-I. Itoh, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 57, 044010 (2015).
- [8] T.S. Hahm, P.H. Diamond, Z. Lin, K. Itoh and S.-I. Itoh, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 46, A323 (2004).
- [9] O.D. Gürcan, P.H. Diamond, T.S. Hahm and Z. Lin, Phys. Plasmas 12, 032303 (2005).
- [10] X. Garbet, Y. Sarazin, F. Imbeaux, P. Ghendrih, C. Bourdelle, O.D. Gürcan and P.H. Diamond, Phys. Plasmas 14, 122305 (2007).
- [11] P.H. Diamond and T.S. Hahm, Plasma Phys. 2, 3640 (1995).
- [12] B.A. Carreras, D. Newman, V.E. Lynch and P.H. Diamond, Phys. Plasmas 3, 2903 (1996).
- [13] N. Kasuya, S. Sugita, M. Sasaki, S. Inagaki, M. Yagi, K. Itoh and S.-I. Itoh, Plasma Fusion Res. 8, 2403070 (2013).
- [14] M. Wakatani, Stellarator and Heliotron Devices (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998).
- [15] X. Garbet, Y. Idomura, L. Villard and T.-H. Watanabe, Nucl. Fusion 50, 043002 (2010).
- [16] M. Nunami, T.-H. Watanabe, H. Sugama and K. Tanaka, Phys. Plasmas 19, 042504 (2012).
- [17] T. Gürler, A.E. White, D. Told, F. Jenko, C. Holland and T.L. Rhodes, Phys. Plasmas 21, 122307 (2014).
- [18] P. Helander, T. Bird, F. Jenko, R. Kleiber, G.G. Plunk, J.H.E. Proll, J. Riemann and P. Xanthopoulos, Nucl. Fusion 55, 053030 (2016).
- [19] P.H. Diamond, S.-I. Itoh, K. Itoh and T.S. Hahm, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 47, R35 (2005).
- [20] V. Naulin, A. Kendl, O.E. Garcia, A.H. Nielsen and J.J. Rasmussen, Phys. Plasmas 12, 052515 (2005).
- [21] S. Murakami et al., Nucl. Fusion 42, L19 (2002).
- [22] T.-H. Watanabe, H. Sugama and S. Ferrando-Margalet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 195002 (2008).
- [23] S.-I. Itoh and K. Itoh, Sci. Rep. 2, 860 (2012).