[Table of Contents]

Plasma and Fusion Research

Volume 9, 1403145 (2014)

Regular Articles


Neoclassical Viscosity of L = 1 Helical-Axis Heliotron Plasmas for Arbitrary Collision Frequencies and Radial Electric Fields
Kenji NISHIOKA, Yuji NAKAMURA and Shin NISHIMURA1)
Graduate School of Energy Science, Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan
1)
National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki, Gifu 509-5292, Japan
(Received 26 November 2013 / Accepted 28 July 2014 / Published 26 December 2014)

Abstract

Numerical methods for solving the monoenergetic drift kinetic equation (DKE) are powerful tools for obtaining viscosity coefficients. However, these methods do not apply when the collision frequency and radial electric field become large. For example, when the radial electric field becomes large, poloidal resonance effect occurs and degrades the accuracy of the numerical solutions to DKE. But when we calculate the neoclassical viscosity in Heliotron J, which is an L = 1 helical-axis heliotron device, we cannot neglect the resonance effect in the presence of high-Z ions. In this study, we combine viscosity coefficients calculated by the numerical method with those obtained from analytical solutions that take the effects of the first poloidal resonance into account. We use this method to obtain monoenergetic viscosity coefficients for arbitrary collision frequencies and radial electric fields in the L = 1 heliotron device.


Keywords

resonance effect, momentum conservation, monoenergetic viscosity coefficients, L = 1 helical-axis heliotron, drift kinetic equation, radial electric field

DOI: 10.1585/pfr.9.1403145


References

  • [1] H. Sugama and S. Nishimura, Phys. Plasmas 9, 4637 (2002).
  • [2] H. Sugama and S. Nishimura, Phys. Plasmas 15, 042502 (2008).
  • [3] S. Nishimura et al., Phys. Plasmas 17, 082510 (2010).
  • [4] S. Nishimura et al., Phys. Plasmas 18, 069901 (2011).
  • [5] H. Lee et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 55, 035012 (2013).
  • [6] S. Kobayashi et al., D1-5-O4, The 12th Asia Pacific Physics Conference of AAPPS, Japan, 2013.
  • [7] G. Motojima et al., Nucl. Fusion 47, 1045 (2007).
  • [8] S. Nishimura et al., J. Plasma Fusion Res. 8, 1003 (2009).
  • [9] K.C. Shaing and E.C. Crume, Jr., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2369 (1989).
  • [10] K.C. Shaing, Phys. Fluids B 5, 3841 (1993).
  • [11] J. Lore et al., Phys. Plasmas 17, 056101 (2010).
  • [12] H. Maaßberg et al., Phys. Fluids B 5, 3627 (1993).
  • [13] S.P. Hirshman et al., Phys. Fluids 29, 2951 (1986).
  • [14] W.I. van Rij and S.P. Hirshman, Phys. Fluids B 1, 563 (1989).
  • [15] D.E. Hastings et al., Nucl. Fusion 29, 2951 (1985).
  • [16] K.C. Shaing and S.A. Hokin, Phys. Fluids 26, 2136 (1983).
  • [17] E.C. Crume, Jr. et al., Phys. Fluids 31, 11 (1988).
  • [18] D.A. Spong, Phys. Plasmas 12, 056114 (2005).
  • [19] S. Nishimura et al., Fusion Sci. Technol. 51, 61 (2007).

This paper may be cited as follows:

Kenji NISHIOKA, Yuji NAKAMURA and Shin NISHIMURA, Plasma Fusion Res. 9, 1403145 (2014).