Plasma and Fusion Research

Volume 18, 2402084 (2023)

Regular Articles

High-Energy Ion Generation During Difference-Frequency ICRF Wave Heating in GAMMA 10/PDX

Yudai SUGIMOTO, Mafumi HIRATA, Yousuke NAKASHIMA, Makoto ICHIMURA, Doyeon KIM, Takaaki KOZAWA, Shunya ENDO, Ryo KOBAYASHI, Ryuya IKEZOE¹⁾, Naomichi EZUMI, Satoshi TOGO, Masayuki YOSHIKAWA, Junko KOHAGURA and Mizuki SAKAMOTO

: Plasma Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577, Japan
1): Research Institute for Applied Mechanics, Kyushu University, Kasuga 816-8580, Japan

(Received 29 December 2022 / Accepted 28 August 2023 / Published 12 October 2023)

Abstract

One of the greatest challenges of simulating the high heat flux on the divertor in linear plasma devices is the achievement of ion temperatures of > 100 eV under high densities (≥ 10¹⁹ m⁻³). The slow wave in the ion cyclotron range of frequency has been employed for ion heating in GAMMA 10/PDX and demonstrated its high efficiency at middle densities of 10¹⁸ m⁻³. However, at high densities (≥ 10¹⁹ m⁻³), exciting the slow wave in the center of the plasma by external antennas becomes challenging. Alternatively, we have demonstrated the excitation of the difference-frequency (DF) slow wave using two high-density-applicable fast waves. In this study, we first applied the charge-exchange neutral particle analyzer (CX-NPA) to a DF wave heating experiment. Even when the bulk temperature did not increase significantly, the high-energy ions in the > 0.5 keV range were measured during the experiment. Such high-energy ions were only measured in the central line of sight of CX-NPA, indicating that the power deposition from the DF wave was largely centered and differed greatly from the normal heating scheme using external antennas. This result will motivate further pursue of exploiting nonlinearity of plasma media to produce different heating accessibilities.

Keywords

ICRF, ion heating, slow wave, fast wave, difference-frequency wave, high density, charge-exchange neutral particle analyzer, mirror plasma, GAMMA 10/PDX, divertor simulation

DOI: 10.1585/pfr.18.2402084

Full Text

PDF format (935Kbytes) PDF Download

References

[1] N. Ohno, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 59, 034007 (2017).
[2] M. Ichimura et al., Nucl. Fusion 28, 799 (1988).
[3] M. Ichimura et al., Plasma Phys. Reports 28, 727 (2002).
[4] R. Katsumata et al., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 30, 854 (1991).
[5] M. Ichimura et al., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 31, 2249 (1992).
[6] Y. Nakashima et al., Nucl. Fusion 57, 116033 (2017).
[7] M. Sakamoto et al., Nucl. Mater. Energy 12, 1004 (2017).
[8] H. Gamo et al., Plasma Fusion Res. 16, 2402041 (2021).
[9] R. Ikezoe et al., Plasma Fusion Res. 14, 2402003 (2019).
[10] R.H. Goulding et al., Phys. Plasmas 30, 013505 (2023).
[11] M. Ichimura et al., J. Plasma Fusion Res. SERIES 8, 893 (2009).
[12] R. Sekine et al., Plasma Fusion Res. 14, 2402011 (2019).
[13] H. Kayano et al., Plasma Fusion Res. 16, 2402045 (2021).
[14] M. Inutake et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 27 (1990).
[15] S. Sumida et al., Fusion Sci. Technol. 68, 136 (2017).
[16] R. Ikezoe et al., Fusion Sci. Technol. 68, 63 (2017).
[17] F.J. Paoloni, Phys. Fluids 18, 640 (1975).
[18] Y. Nakashima et al., Fusion Eng. Des. 34-35, 555 (1997).
[19] M. Shoji et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 43, 761 (2001).
[20] Y. Nakashima et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70, 849 (1999).
[21] M. Shoji et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 2846 (1996).
[22] R. Ikezoe et al., AIP Conference Proceedings 1771, 050002 (2016).
[23] R. Ikezoe et al., JINST 12, C12017 (2017).