Plasma and Fusion Research

Volume 16, 2405053 (2021)

Regular Articles


Influence of Cu-Y Compound Content on the Microstructure of Cu-Y2O3 Dispersion Strengthened Alloys Synthesized by MA and HIP Process
Bing MA1), Yoshimitsu HISHINUMA1,2), Hiroyuki NOTO1,2) and Takeo MUROGA1,2)
1)
The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI, Toki 509-5292, Japan
2)
National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki 509-5292, Japan
(Received 16 November 2020 / Accepted 11 February 2021 / Published 7 June 2021)

Abstract

Oxide Dispersion Strengthened Cu alloy (ODS-Cu) with Y2O3 has great application potential in the field of fusion. In the previous fabrication method by adding metal Y as the source of Y2O3, severe sticking occurred during mechanical alloying (MA) and huge Y particles still remained after MA. Considering that Cu-Y compounds are more brittle than pure Y, which is expected to resolve the sticking issue, and have lower Y enrichment, which will make it easier to form uniform Y distribution, ODS-Cu with various content of Y by adding Cu2Y or Cu6Y were fabricated through MA and Hot isostatic pressing (HIP) process. A comparative analysis was made for the samples with addition of Cu2Y and Cu6Y. The results showed that, compared with Cu2Y, Cu6Y is easier to form uniform Y distribution. The most likely reason is that the Cu6Y is more brittle and less Y abundance than Cu2Y. The sample with 0.39 wt% Y with Cu6Y addition has the highest Vickers hardness, possibly because of solution strengthening caused by higher content of interstitial O, and better electrical conductivity than the sample with 1.19 wt% Y with Cu6Y possibly because of the more uniform formation of Y2O3 and the absence of precipitation phases.


Keywords

Cu alloy, ODS, Y2O3, Cu2Y, Cu6Y, mechanical alloying

DOI: 10.1585/pfr.16.2405053


References

  • [1] Brochure GlidCop© Copper Dispersion Strengthened with Aluminum Oxide, SCM Metals Products, Inc., Research Trianplc Park, NC (1994).
  • [2] M.S. Abd-Elwahed et al., Ceramics International 46, 56 (2020).
  • [3] S.M.S. Aghamiri et al., Nucl. Mater. Energy 15, 17 (2018).
  • [4] M.M. Li et al., Comprehensive Nuclear Materials (Second Edition) 6, 93 (2020).
  • [5] D.V. Kudashov et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 387-389, 768 (2004).
  • [6] U. Martin et al., WIT Trans. Built. Environ. 6(7), 341 (2004).
  • [7] G. Carro et al., Fusion Eng. Des. 138, 321 (2019).
  • [8] B. Huang et al., Nucl. Mater. Energy 16, 168 (2018).
  • [9] B. Ma et al., Nucl. Mater. Energy 24, 1007732 (2020).
  • [10] D. Alderton et al., X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), Encyclopedia of Geology, 2nd edition 2020.
  • [11] B. Ma et al., Fusion Eng. Des. 161, 112045 (2020).
  • [12] M.E. Straumanis et al., Acta Crystallogr. A25, 676 (1969).