Plasma and Fusion Research

Volume 13, 3402106 (2018)

Regular Articles


Evaluation of Turbulent Particle Flux by Heavy Ion Beam Probe in the T-10 Tokamak
Leonid G. ELISEEV1), Alexander V. MELNIKOV1,2), Sergey E. LYSENKO1), Philipp O. KHABANOV1,4), Vitaly N. ZENIN1,4), Mikhail A. DRABINSKIJ1,4), Nikolaj K. KHARCHEV1), Alexander S. KOZACHEK3), Ludmila I. KRUPNIK3) and HIBP Team3)
1)
National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 123182, Moscow, Russia
2)
National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, 115409, Moscow, Russia
3)
Institute of Plasma Physics, NSC KIPT, 310108, Kharkov, Ukraine
4)
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 141700, Dolgoprudny, Russia
(Received 27 December 2017 / Accepted 24 May 2018 / Published 25 September 2018)

Abstract

In the T-10 tokamak, the local fluctuations of poloidal electric field Epol and density ñe were simultaneously measured by heavy ion beam probe (HIBP) with 5-slit energy analyzer that allow us to estimate the turbulent particle flux and E × B rotation velocity in the gradient zone of plasma column (r/a = 0.8). It was shown that at the Ohmic heating (OH) stage of discharge, the outward flux is in the range of 2 × 1019 m−2 s−1, increasing at the ECRH stage by a factor of 1.5. At OH stage, the poloidal rotation velocity is about 4.5 km/s.


Keywords

turbulent flux, HIBP, T-10 tokamak, quasicoherent mode

DOI: 10.1585/pfr.13.3402106


References

  • [1] D.R. Demers et al., Phys. Plasmas 8, 1278 (2001).
  • [2] Yu.N. Dnestrovskij et al., IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, (Aug 1994), Vol.22, Issue: 4, pp.310-331.
  • [3] A.V. Melnikov et al., Nucl. Fusion 57, 072004 (2017).
  • [4] V.A. Vershkov et al., Nucl. Fusion 55, 063014 (2015).
  • [5] A.V. Melnikov, Nature Physics 12, 386 (2016).
  • [6] A.V. Melnikov et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 48, No 4, S87 (2006).
  • [7] A.V. Melnikov et al., Nucl. Fusion 55, 063001 (2015).
  • [8] A.V. Melnikov et al., Nucl. Fusion 57, 115001 (2017).
  • [9] L.G. Eliseev et al., Study of the large-scale MHD mode and its effect on GAM in the T-10 tokamak, 42nd EPS Conf. on Plasma Phys. P5.159, http://ocs.ciemat.es/EPS2015PAP/pdf/P5.159.pdf
  • [10] A.V. Melnikov et al., Nucl. Fusion 54, 123002 (2014).
  • [11] A.V. Melnikov et al., Nucl. Fusion 56, 076001 (2016).
  • [12] A.V. Melnikov et al., Nucl. Fusion 56, 112019 (2016).
  • [13] A.V. Melnikov et al., Nucl. Fusion 52, 123004 (2012).
  • [14] L.G. Eliseev et al., Probl. Atom. Sci. Techn. Ser. Plasma Physics 107, 241 (2017).
  • [15] L.G. Eliseev et al., J. Phys.: Conf. Series 907, 012002 (2017).
  • [16] D.W. Ross et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 2232 (1992).
  • [17] E.J. Powers et al., Nucl. Fusion 14, 749 (1974).
  • [18] V.F. Andreev et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 58, 055008 (2016).