Plasma and Fusion Research

Volume 11, 2405065 (2016)

Regular Articles


Evaluation of Shear Strength in Soldered and Mechanical Lap Joints of High-Temperature Superconducting Tapes Intended for a Remountable Magnet
Luis APARICIO, Satoshi ITO and Hidetoshi HASHIZUME
Department of Quantum Science and Energy Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, 6-6-01-2 Aramaki-Aza-Aoba, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8579, Japan
(Received 3 December 2015 / Accepted 9 March 2016 / Published 17 May 2016)

Abstract

This study describes the electro-mechanical response under tensile and shear stresses of the mechanical and soldered lap-joint methods proposed for joining Rare-Earth Barium Copper Oxide (REBCO) high-temperature superconducting (HTS) coated conductors (CCs) in designs of a "remountable" (demountable) HTS magnet and joint-winding of an HTS magnet intended for the helical fusion reactor FFHR-d1. Proper joint of REBCO CCs for the HTS magnets not only requires sufficiently low joint resistance to avoid quench phenomena, but also involves mechanical stability against large electromagnetic forces. Results obtained from tensile test to apply shear stress namely tensile shear tests performed on mechanically jointed REBCO CCs showed that the linear proportionality between shear strength and contact conductivity of the joint is conserved for larger joint section area. An attempt to describe the failure mechanism of mechanical lap-joint revealed that a bending moment is originated at the joint section. Furthermore, results from tensile shear test on soldered joint between REBCO CCs with copper stabilizer showed failure of the REBCO CCs with small axial loads while joint remained intact.


Keywords

segment-fabrication, demountable magnet, remountable magnet, high-temperature superconductor, REBCO coated conductors, mechanical lap-joint, soldered lap-joint

DOI: 10.1585/pfr.11.2405065


References

  • [1] J.R. Powell et al., Cryogenics 20, 59 (1980).
  • [2] K. Uo et al., IEEE Trans. Mag. 23, 580 (1987).
  • [3] Bromberg et al., Fusion Eng. Des. 54, 167 (2001).
  • [4] H. Hashizume et al., J. Plasma Fusion Res. SERIES. 5, 532 (2002).
  • [5] Z.S. Hartwig et al., Fusion Eng. Des. 87, 201 (2012).
  • [6] B.N. Sorbom et al., Fusion Eng. Des. to be published.
  • [7] A. Sagara et al., Fusion Eng. Des. 89, 2114 (2014).
  • [8] N. Yanagi et al., Fusion Sci. Techol. 60, 648 (2011).
  • [9] H. Hashizume and S. Ito, Fusion Eng. Des. 89, 2241 (2014).
  • [10] N. Yanagi et al., Nucl. Fusion 55, 053021 (2015).
  • [11] S. Ito et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 26, 4201510 (2016).
  • [12] S. Ito et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 25, 4201025 (2015).
  • [13] K. Kawai et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 23, 6409408 (2013).
  • [14] S. Ito et al., Plasma Fusion Res. 9, 3405086 (2014).
  • [15] M. Sugano et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 17, 9606863 (2007).
  • [16] R.D. Adamas and W.C. Wake, Structural Adhesive Joints in Engineering (Elsevier Appl. Sci. Publishers, England 1984) p.16.
  • [17] M. Sugano et al., Supercond. Sci. Technol. 25, 054014 (2012).
  • [18] Y. Seino et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 25, 6603405 (2015).
  • [19] D. Tabor, The Royal Society Publishing Proceedings A 251, 1266 (1959).
  • [20] C. Mathew, Tribology on the Small Scale (Oxford University Press. 2008) pp.70-72.