Regular Articles

Full Text / References

Decoupling of Electron and Ion Dynamics in Driven Magnetic Reconnection in Collisionless Plasmas

C. Z. CHENG, Shizuo INOUE¹⁾, Yasushi ONO and Ritoku HORIUCHI²⁾

School of Frontier Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan

1)

Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Naka 311-0193, Japan

2)

National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki 509-5292, Japan

(Received 31 December 2015 / Accepted 2 April 2016 / Published 10 June 2016)

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to describe the decoupling processes of electron and ion dynamics in the reconnection layer (current sheet and separatrix regions) and how the in-plane electrostatic electric field and the parallel electric field are produced. During driven magnetic reconnection of oppositely directed magnetic field lines, both ions and electrons drift together with the merging field lines toward the neutral sheet where the magnetic field lines reconnect. Because the electron outflow velocity is much larger than the ion outflow velocity, a pair of currents flow inward toward the magnetic reconnection region and produce the quadrupole out-of-plane magnetic field concentrated around the separatrix regions. The parallel electric field is produced by the driving electric field and the quadrupole magnetic field and points toward the downstream direction. The parallel electric field accelerates electrons toward the reconnection region direction but ions move slowly across the separatrix field lines, which causes decoupling of the electron and ion flow dynamics around the separatrix regions to generate charge separation and produce electrostatic electric field pointing across the separatrix field lines toward the mid-plane direction. Around the magnetic reconnection region where the magnetic fields become weakened and reversed, the particle orbits perpendicular to the field lines become meandering. Because the ion meandering region width is much larger than the electron meandering region width, charge separation is produced inside the ion meandering region and produces a pair of strong bipolar in-plane electrostatic electric fields pointing toward the mid-plane direction. With the production of quadrupole magnetic field, the parallel electric field and the electrostatic electric field, particle dynamics and acceleration/heating can be understood.

Copyright (c) 2016 The Japan Society of Plasma Science and Nuclear Fusion Research

Keywords

magnetic reconnection, kinetic theory, parallel electric field, decoupling of electron-ion dynamics, electron acceleration, ion heating

DOI: 10.1585/pfr.11.1401081

Full Text

PDF format (3.3Mbytes)

References

• [1] C.Z. Cheng, S. Inoue, Y. Ono and R. Horiuchi, Phys. Plasmas 22, 101205 (2015).
• [2] M. Ohtani and R. Horiuchi, Plasma Fusion Res. 4, 024 (2009).
• [3] B.U.O. Sonnerup, Magnetic field reconnection, in Solar System Plasma Physics, edited by L.J. Lanzerotti, C. Kennel and E. Parker (North-Holland, New York, 1979), p.45.
• [4] D.A. Uzdensky and R.M. Kulsrud, Phys. Plasmas 13, 062305 (2006).
• [5] M. Hoshino, J. Geophys. Res. 110, A10215 (2005).
• [6] L.-J. Chen, W.S. Daughton, B. Lefebvre and R.B. Torbert, Phys. Plasmas 18, 012904 (2011).
• [7] M. Hoshino, T. Mukai, T. Terasawa and I. Shinoha, J. Geophys. Res. 106, 25979 (2001).
• [8] M.A. Shay, J.F. Drake, B.N. Rogers and R.E. Denton, J. Geophys. Res. 106, 3759 (2001).
• [9] J. Egedal, M. Oieroset, W. Fox and R.P. Lin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 025006 (2005).
• [10] J. Egedal, W. Daughton and A. Le, Nature Phys. 8, 321 (2012).
• [11] K. Fujimoto, Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 2721 (2014).
• [12] K. Fujimoto and M. Takamoto, Phys. Plasmas 23, 012903 (2016).
• [13] A. Ishizawa and R. Horiuchi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 045003 (2005).
• [14] K. Arzner and M. Scholer, J. Geophys. Res. 106, 3827 (2001).
• [15] M. Hoshino, J. Geophys. Res. 92, 7368 (1987).
• [16] K. Fujimoto, Phys. Plasmas 13, 072904 (2006).
• [17] J.R. Wygant et al., J. Geophys. Res. 110, A09206 (2005).
• [18] J.F. Drake, M.A. Shay and M. Swisdak, Phys. Plasmas 15, 042306 (2008).
• [19] R. Horiuchi and H. Ohtani, Comm. Comput. Phys. 4, 496 (2008).
• [20] Y. Asano et al., J. Geophys. Res. 113, A01207 (2008).
• [21] J. Egedal et al., J. Geophys. Res. 115, A03214 (2010).
• [22] J. Yoo, M. Yamada, H. Ji and C.E. Myers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 215007 (2013).
• [23] M. Yamada et al., Nature Comm. 5, 4774 (2014), doi:10.1038/ncomms5774.