Plasma and Fusion Research
Volume 9, 3405138 (2014)
Regular Articles
- The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba 277-8568, Japan
- 1)
- Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, Komae-shi, Tokyo 201-8511, Japan
Abstract
Fatigue issue of a pulsed operation tokamak is studied for the major radii Rp = 10 m, 11 m and 12 m in this paper. By study of central solenoid coil (CS) fatigue, it is clarified that pulse cycle number of the reference of 10 m throughout 30-year operation period is about 50,000 and its allowable stress amplitude for CS fatigue is about 300 MPa. This constraint has actually no impact on the CS designs of the reference tokamaks. Allowable length of toroidal field coil (TFC) maintenance port of the reference 10 m tokamak is calculated to be 13.3 m, which is corresponding to 92 % of TFC height. Also the minimum width of each cryostat post which supports the overturning force of TFC is found to be 2.3 m to prevent its fracture. This result indicates that fatigue may have impact on rather outer support structure of TFC than TFC itself. This construction cost for strengthening cryostat post could reach a few of hundreds million dollars according to a rough calculation.
Keywords
fatigue life curve, pulsed tokamak reactor, pulse duration, CS, central solenoid coil, TFC, toroidal field coil, equivalent alternating stress, Modified-Goodman Diagram
Full Text
References
- [1] Y. Ogawa, N. Inoue, Z. Yoshida and K. Okano, Fusion Technol. 24, 188 (1993).
- [2] G.T. Sager, D.-K. Sze, C.P.C. Wong et al., Fusion Eng. Des. 29, 43 (1995).
- [3] K. Okano, G. Federici and K. Tobita, “DEMO Design Activities in the Broader Approach under Japana/EU Collaboration” in ISFNT 2013 Barcelona (2013).
- [4] T. Yoshida, T. Nanahara, K. Yamaji and T. Takuma, CRIEPI Research Report T94001 (1994) [in Japanese], Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, Japan.
- [5] K. Hamada et al., Fusion Eng. Des. 75-79, 87 (2005).
- [6] T.N. Todd, R. Clarke, H. Kalsi et al., CCFE Technical Report CCFE-R(12)17 (2012), Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, UK.
- [7] K. Tobita, S. Nishio, M. Enoeda et al., JAEA-Research 2010-019 (2010), Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Japan.
- [8] K. Hamada, H. Nakajima, K. Kawano et al., Fusion Eng. Des. 82, 1481 (2007).
This paper may be cited as follows:
Toshihiro HAMADA, Kunihiko OKANO and Ryoji HIWATARI, Plasma Fusion Res. 9, 3405138 (2014).