[Table of Contents]

Plasma and Fusion Research

Volume 8, 1402058 (2013)

Regular Articles

Behavior of Plasma Response Field in Detached Plasma
Yoshiro NARUSHIMA, Masahiro KOBAYASHI, Tsuyoshi AKIYAMA, Satoru SAKAKIBARA, Suguru MASUZAKI, Naoko ASHIKAWA and Noriyasu OHNO1)
National Institute for Fusion Science, 322-6 Oroshi-cho, Toki 509-5292, Japan
1)
Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan
(Received 25 January 2013 / Accepted 21 March 2013 / Published 22 May 2013)

Abstract

Sustaining a detached plasma is important for the reduction of the heat load on a divertor. The externally controlled methods such as gas puffing in the divertor region, etc. have been studied for maintaining detached plasmas. In the recent LHD experiments, a resonant magnetic perturbation (RMP) is utilized to establish the detached plasma, which is one of the candidates to reduce the divertor heat load. The finite plasma response field has been detected when the RMP is imposed, and its behavior is investigated from the viewpoint of the magnetic island dynamics. A parameter of the phase difference, Δθ (defined as the phase difference between the plasma response field and the RMP), changes from antiphase to in-phase while the plasma transits from the attached to the detached states. Finally, when the Δθ reaches at certain critical value, Δθcrit, the plasma enters the detached state. Since this critical value does not have a dependency on plasma beta and collisionality, Δθcrit seems to be a threshold to establish the detached plasma. From the viewpoint of magnetic island dynamics, the behavior of Δθ approaching in-phase implies the “trend” of island growth. The detached plasma might be established in the case of the tendency for the plasma response field to reinforce the island width.

Keywords

LHD, detachment, magnetic island, resonant magnetic perturbation, plasma response field

DOI: 10.1585/pfr.8.1402058

Full Text

PDF format (724Kbytes) PDF Download

References

  • [1] C.S. Pitcher and P.C. Stangeby, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 39, 779 (1997).
  • [2] O. Gruber, A. Kallenbach, M. Kaufmann, K. Lackner, V. Mertens, J. Neuhauser, F. Ryter, H. Zohm et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4217 (1995).
  • [3] M. Kobayashi, S. Masuzaki, I. Yamada, N. Tamura, Y. Feng, K. Sato, M. Goto, Y. Narushima et al., Phys. Plasmas 17, 056111 (2010).
  • [4] Y. Narushima, K.Y. Watanabe, S. Sakakibara, K. Narihara, I. Yamada, Y. Suzuki, S. Ohdachi, N. Ohyabu et al., Nucl. Fusion 48, 075010 (2008).
  • [5] Y. Narushima, F. Castejón, S. Sakakibara, K.Y. Watanabe, S. Ohdachi, Y. Suzuki, T. Estrada et al., Nucl. Fusion 51, 083030 (2011).
  • [6] T. Morisaki, N. Ohyabu, S. Masuzaki, M. Kobayashi, R. Sakamoto, J. Miyazawa, H. Funaba et al., Phys. Plasmas 14, 056113 (2007).
  • [7] M. Kobayashi, S. Masuzaki, I. Yamada, Y. Narushima, C. Suzuki, N. Tamura et al., 24th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference CN-197 EX/4-4 (2012) San Diego, USA.
  • [8] B. Lipschultz, J. Nucl. Mater. 15, 145 (1987).

This paper may be cited as follows:

Yoshiro NARUSHIMA, Masahiro KOBAYASHI, Tsuyoshi AKIYAMA, Satoru SAKAKIBARA, Suguru MASUZAKI, Naoko ASHIKAWA and Noriyasu OHNO, Plasma Fusion Res. 8, 1402058 (2013).