[Table of Contents]

Plasma and Fusion Research

Volume 1, 003 (2006)

Regular Articles


Effects of Resonant Magnetic Fluctuations on Plasma Confinement in Current Carrying high-β Plasmas of LHD
Satoru SAKAKIBARA, Kiyomasa WATANABE, Hiroshi YAMADA, Yoshiro NARUSHIMA, Kazuo TOI, Satoshi OHDACHI, Taiki YAMAGUCHI1), Kazumichi NARIHARA, Kenji TANAKA, Tokihiko TOKUZAWA, Katsumi IDA, Osamu KANEKO, Kazuo KAWAHATA, Akio KOMORI and LHD Experimental Group
National Institute for Fusion Science
1)
Department of Fusion Science, Graduate University for Advanced Studies
(Received 1 August 2005 / Accepted 9 December 2005 / Published 31 January 2006)

Abstract

The effects of resonant magnetic fluctuations on plasma confinement have been investigated in current carrying high-β plasmas in magnetic hill configurations of the Large Helical Device. The m/n= 2/1 mode excited in core region was dominantly observed in the unstable configuration as predicted by linear theory on ideal instability, and the plasma current decreasing magnetic shear enhances the mode activity. The disappearance of the m/n = 2/1 mode was observed with an increase in plasma current, and then the plasma confinement and the beta value increase by less than 10 % with the recovery of core pressure. When the plasma current exceeds a certain value, the plasma confinement is improved by 20 % with the reduction of the amplitudes of the modes in the peripheral region in addition to the disappearance of the m/n = 2/1 mode. Then the beta value increases by 38 %. MHD activities led to no disruption even in such an unstable configuration, and the moderate plasma current mitigated the effect of MHD activity on the plasma confinement.


Keywords

MHD, interchange mode, heliotron, magnetic fluctuation, high-beta

DOI: 10.1585/pfr.1.003


References

  • [1] Y.Q. Liu et al., Phys. Plasmas 7, 3681 (2000).
  • [2] A. Isayama et al., Nucl. Fusion 43, 1272 (2003).
  • [3] S. Sakakibara et al., Nucl. Fusion 41, 1177 (2001).
  • [4] S. Ohdachi et al., Proc. 13th Int. Stellarator Workshop, Canberra, Australia, February 25-March 1, 2002.
  • [5] S. Sakakibara et al., Plasma Phys. Control Fusion 44, A217 (2002).
  • [6] K.Y. Watanabe et al., Fusion Sci. Tech. 46, 24 (2004).
  • [7] K. Toi et al., Nucl. Fusion 44, 217 (2004).
  • [8] S. Sakakibara et al., J. Journal Appl. Phys. 34, pt2, 2B, 252 (1995).
  • [9] K. Toi et al, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 38, 1289 (1996).
  • [10] K.Y. Watanabe et al., Journal of Plasma and Fusion Research SERIES 5, 124 (2003).
  • [11] O. Motojima et al., Nucl. Fusion 43, 1674 (2003).
  • [12] S.P. Hirshman and W.I. van RIJP. Merkel, Comput. Phys. Commun. 43, 143 (1986).
  • [13] K. Ichiguchi et al., Nucl. Fusion 29, 2093 (1989).
  • [14] U. Stroth et al., Nucl. Fusion 36, 1063 (1996).
  • [15] K.Y. Watanabe et al., Nucl. Fusion 45, 1247 (2005).

This paper may be cited as follows:

Satoru SAKAKIBARA, Kiyomasa WATANABE, Hiroshi YAMADA, Yoshiro NARUSHIMA, Kazuo TOI, Satoshi OHDACHI, Taiki YAMAGUCHI, Kazumichi NARIHARA, Kenji TANAKA, Tokihiko TOKUZAWA, Katsumi IDA, Osamu KANEKO, Kazuo KAWAHATA, Akio KOMORI and LHD Experimental Group, Plasma Fusion Res. 1, 003 (2006).