Regular Articles

Full Text / References

Finite T_i Effects on Parallel-Velocity-Gradient Driven Instability

Itsuki OYAMA¹⁾, Yusuke KOSUGA²⁾

1)

Interdisciplinary graduate school of engineering science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 816-8580, Japan

2)

Research Institute for Applied Mechanics, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 816-8580, Japan

(Received 8 July 2025 / Accepted 4 November 2025 / Published 25 March 2026)

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of finite ion temperature on the linear growth rate of the parallel velocity gradient (PVG)-driven instability. Parallel (toroidal) flows are prevalent in magnetically confined fusion plasmas, where external momentum sources such as neutral beam injection (NBI) can act as a potential driver for PVG instabilities in both conventional and spherical tokamaks. Accurate transport modeling using quasi-linear models such as TGLF or QuaLiKiz requires a fundamental understanding of the characteristics of PVG modes in warm plasmas. The linear stability analysis is conducted to include the finite ion temperature effects. Depending on the radial profiles of ion temperature and parallel velocity, the dominant unstable modes can be categorized as either ion temperature gradient (ITG) or PVG-driven modes. These two instabilities are found to be mutually exclusive in their parameter spaces. Both modes become excited when the compression becomes negative. The ITG and PVG modes are each strengthened by the gradient that drives the other, up to the point where the driving gradient exceeds the instability threshold of the respective mode. In the PVG-dominant regime, increasing the temperature ratio enhances the compression and thereby exerts the stabilizing effects, whereas the temperature gradient contributes to PVG growth until the ITG thresholds is reached.

Copyright (c) 2026 The Japan Society of Plasma Science and Nuclear Fusion Research

Keywords

ion temperature gradient driven mode, parallel velocity gradient driven mode, instability, temperature ratio

DOI: 10.1585/pfr.21.1403013

Full Text

PDF format (1.6Mbytes)

References

• [1] A.J. Creely et al., J. Plasma Phys. 86, 865860502 (2020).
• [2] S.M. Kaye et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 63, 123001 (2021).
• [3] W.X. Wang et al., Phys. Plasmas 22, 102509 (2015).
• [4] I.T. Chapman et al., Nucl. Fusion 52, 042005 (2012).
• [5] Y. Kosuga, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 93, 064501 (2024).
• [6] S.L. Newton et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 52, 125001 (2010).
• [7] I. Oyama et al., Plasma Fusion Res. 19, 1403019 (2024).
• [8] Y. Kosuga et al., Phys. Plasmas 24, 032304 (2017).
• [9] Y. Kosuga et al., Plasma Fusion Res. 10, 3401024 (2015).
• [10] T. Kaneko et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 124001 (2003).
• [11] S. Inagaki et al., Sci. Rep. 6, 22189 (2016).
• [12] T. Kobayashi et al., Phys. Plasmas 23, 102311 (2016).
• [13] S. Mazzi et al., Nucl. Fusion 62, 096024 (2022).
• [14] A. Schekochihin et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 54, 055011 (2012).
• [15] E.G. Highcock et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 265001 (2012).
• [16] J. Citrin et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 59, 124005 (2017).
• [17] G.M. Steabler et al., Phys. Plasmas 14, 055909 (2007).
• [18] G.M. Steabler et al., Phys. Plasmas 17, 122309 (2010).
• [19] A.M. Dimits et al., Phys. Plasmas 7, 969 (2000).
• [20] J. Bourgeois et al., Open Plasma Science 1, 1 (2024).
• [21] G. Cuerva-Lazaro et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 67, 075019 (2025).
• [22] Y. Kosuga et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 66, 075018 (2024).
• [23] V.V. Mikhailenko et al., Phys. Plasmas 23, 092301 (2016).
• [24] V.V. Mikhailenko et al., Phys. Plasmas 27, 112103 (2020).