Plasma and Fusion Research
Volume 20, 1402024 (2025)
Regular Articles
- 1)
- Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8561, Japan
- 2)
- National Institutes of Quantum Science and Technology, Naka 311-0193, Japan
- 3)
- National Institute for Fusion Science, National Institutes of Natural Sciences, Toki 509-5292, Japan
- 4)
- Tsukuba University, Tsukuba 305-8573, Japan
- 5)
- The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI, Toki 509-5292, Japan
Abstract
The transition condition from an attached state to a detached state of magnetic confinement plasmas has been investigated by a data-drive approach in LHD. This transition is defined as a binary classification problem of two states, and Support Vector Machine together with Exhaust Search has been applied. The boundary between detachment and attachment in the physical parameter space has been identified as a decision function comprising radiation and heating power, magnetic field and the resonant magnetic flux. While resonant magnetic perturbation (RMP) secures stable detached plasmas, it has been found that the featured parameter is not externally applied RMP itself but the plasma response to RMP. The present approach gives a robust separation boundary even for the extended operation with radiation enhancement by neon gas puff. Anomaly detection with a singular value decomposition has been also applied to the temporal behavior and identified pre- and post-relationships of each physical parameter in time. Emissions from carbon impurities with low ionization potential start to change prior to the RMP penetration and then the drop of ion saturation current, that is the transition to detachment, happens. These temporal sequences do not necessarily mean causality but are helpful for approach to physical inference.
Keywords
detached plasma, resonant magnetic perturbation, large helical device, support vector machine, anomaly detection
Full Text
References
- [1] P.C. Stangeby, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 60, 044022 (2018).
- [2] S.I. Krashennikov and A.S. Kukushkin, J. Plasma Phys. 83, 155830501 (2017).
- [3] M. Kobayashi et al., Nucl. Fusion 53, 093032 (2013).
- [4] M. Kobayashi et al., Nucl. Fusion 59, 096009 (2019).
- [5] M. Kobayashi et al., Nucl. Fusion 62, 056006 (2022).
- [6] Y. Feng et al., Contrib. Plasma Phys. 54, 426 (2014).
- [7] S.N. Pandya et al., Nucl. Fusion 56, 046002 (2016).
- [8] M. Kobayashi and M.Z. Tokar, Contrib. Plasma Phys. 60, e201900138 (2020).
- [9] M.Z. Tokar and M. Kobayashi, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 62, 085011 (2020).
- [10] Y. Igarashi et al., J. Phys: Conference Series 1036, 012001 (2018).
- [11] T. Yokoyama et al., Plasma Fusion Res. 16, 1402073 (2021).
- [12] T. Yokoyama et al., J. Fusion Energy 39, 500 (2020).
- [13] R. Seki et al., Plasma Fusion Res. 14, 3402126 (2019).
- [14] Y. Narushima et al., Plasma Fusion Res. 8, 1402058 (2013).
- [15] Y. Narushima et al., Nucl. Fusion 48, 075010 (2008).
- [16] K. Mukai et al., Nucl. Fusion 61, 126018 (2021).
- [17] V. Moskvina and A. Zhigljavsky, Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation 32, 319 (2003).
- [18] T. Ide and K. Tsuda, in Proc. 2009 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, SDM 09, (Sparks, Nevada, USA, 2009), 97–108.