Plasma and Fusion Research
Volume 19, 1405013 (2024)
Regular Articles
- National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Naka 311-0193, Japan
Abstract
ITER toroidal field coils are electrically connected to 68-kA main busbars (terminal joints). We propose the measurement of the electric potential distribution in a terminal joint using electrical probes (e-probe method) to inspect the contact resistance in the joint. In this study, we experimented with a mockup of a terminal joint. The test current was 20 A, and the electric potential was measured using the e-probe method at room temperature and 77 K. Nine different degradation patterns were prepared by distributing polyimide films in the joint interface. Next, we performed finite element analysis to investigate the detailed relationship between the electric potential distribution and contact resistance at 300 K and 77 K. In the numerical analysis, the same degradation patterns and test current as in the experiment were assumed. The analysis results agree with the experimental results. Different degradation patterns exhibit different electric potential profiles with 10-µV-scale differences. The analysis results also indicate that the e-probe method works when the contact resistance in the degraded area is larger than 1.0 × 10−5 Ωmm2 at 77 K and 300 K.
Keywords
ITER, fusion magnet, terminal joint, low-temperature superconductor, contact resistance
Full Text
References
- [1] Y. Ilyin et al., “Design and Qualification of Joints for ITER Magnet Busbar System”, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 26, 4800905 (2016).
- [2] Y. Ilyin et al., “Qualification Program of Lap Joints for ITER Coils”, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 28, 4201306 (2018).
- [3] H. Kajitani et al., “New Inspection Method of Soldering Region at Room Temperature for ITER TF Termination”, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 29, 4200604 (2019).
- [4] H. Kajitani et al., “Results of All ITER TF Full-Size Joint Sample Tests in Japan”, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 31, 4201905 (2021).
- [5] H. Kajitani et al., “Evaluation of ITER TF Coil Joint Performance”, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond, 25, 4202204 (2015).
- [6] E.W. Collings, “Anomalous electrical resistivity, bcc phase stability, and superconductivity in titanium-vanadium alloys”, Phys. Rev. B 9, 3989 (1974).
- [7] Z. Ren et al., “Evolution of T2 resistivity and superconductivity in Nb3Sn under pressure”, Phys. Rev. B 95, 184503 (2017).
- [8] Ansys® Mechanical, Release 18.2
- [9] A.F. Clark et al., “Electrical resistivity of some engineering alloys at low temperatures”, Cryogenics 10, 295 (1970).
- [10] J.G. Hust et al., “Standard Reference Materials for Thermal Conductivity and Electrical Resistivity”, In: Klemens P.G., Chu T.K. (eds) Thermal Conductivity 14 (Springer, Boston, MA., 1976).
- [11] G.K. White et al., “Metals: Electronic Transport Phenomena”, In: J. Bass (eds) (Springer, Boston, MA., 1957).