Plasma and Fusion Research

Volume 15, 2405014 (2020)

Regular Articles

Investigation for Contact Interface of Mechanical Lap Joint Fabricated with High-Temperature Superconducting Conductor Using X-Ray Microtomography
Weixi CHEN, Satoshi ITO, Noritaka YUSA and Hidetoshi HASHIZUME
Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8579, Japan
(Received 29 November 2019 / Accepted 21 February 2020 / Published 27 March 2020)

Abstract

Joint winding of high-temperature superconducting (HTS) helical coil with conductor segments that are connected using bridge-type mechanical lap joints is considered as a promising method of fabricating magnet for a FFHR heliotron-type fusion reactor. Although methods for joining large-scale HTS conductor has been developed using the “simple-stack” and “joint-piece” procedures, the difference between these procedures is unclear. In this study, the two-row-four-layer joint samples were fabricated via the two joining procedures and compared in terms of contact resistivity. Joint thickness and joint resistance were measured; the contact area at the contact interface was evaluated using an X-ray computer tomography scan, to obtain the precise contact resistivity of the joint. The contact resistivity of the sample fabricated via the “simple-stack procedure” ranged from 2.41 - 5.15 pΩm2, whereas that of the sample fabricated using the “joint-piece procedure” ranged from 1.98 - 6.07 pΩm2. There was no significant difference between the procedures in terms of contact resistivity range. Considering the characteristics of joint thickness and location distribution of each lap joint, the inhomogeneous joining pressure was the primary factor affecting contact resistivity. As the similarity of electrical performances of the two procedures was clarified, future studies should focus on the manufacturability of large-scale joints.

Keywords

high-temperature superconducting magnet, joint-winding, mechanical lap joint, contact resistivity, X-ray computer tomography scan

DOI: 10.1585/pfr.15.2405014

Full Text

PDF format (2.1Mbytes) PDF Download

References

  • [1] N. Yanagi et al., Fusion Sci. Technol. 60, 648 (2011).
  • [2] N. Yanagi et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 24, 4202805 (2014).
  • [3] N. Yanagi et al., Nucl. Fusion 55, 053021 (2015).
  • [4] A. Sagara et al., Fusion Eng. Des. 89, 2114 (2014).
  • [5] A. Sagara et al., Nucl. Fusion 57, 086046 (2017).
  • [6] S. Ito et al., Plasma Fusion Res. 9, 3405086 (2014).
  • [7] S. Ito et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 26, 4201510 (2016).
  • [8] T. Nishio et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 26, 4800505 (2016).
  • [9] T. Nishio et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 27, 4603305 (2017).
  • [10] H. Hashizume et al., Nucl. Fusion 58, 026014 (2018).
  • [11] S. Ito et al., Fusion Eng. Des. 136, 239 (2018).
  • [12] S. Ito et al., Fusion Eng. Des. 146, 590 (2019).
  • [13] C. Scheuerlein et al., Supercond. Sci. Technol. 24, 115004 (2011).
  • [14] M. Inoue et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 26, 6201004 (2016).
  • [15] I. Tiseanu et al., Fusion Eng. Des. 88, 1613 (2013).
  • [16] W. Chen et al., Fusion Eng. Des. 148, 111284 (2019).
  • [17] N. Bagrets et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 28, 6600204 (2018).
  • [18] R. Hayasaka et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 29, 9000805 (2019).
  • [19] J.W. Ekin, Experimental Techniques for Low-Temperature Measurements (Oxford Univ. Press, Boulder, 2006).
  • [20] R. Holm, Electric Contacts Theory and Application (Spring-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg 1967).
  • [21] S. Ito et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 26, 6601505 (2016).
  • [22] S. Ito et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 24, 4602305 (2014).