Plasma and Fusion Research
Volume 15, 2402063 (2020)
Regular Articles
- Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Engineering Sciences, Kyushu University, Kasuga, Fukuoka 816-8580, Japan
- 1)
- Research Institute for Applied Mechanics, Kyushu University, Kasuga, Fukuoka 816-8580, Japan
- 2)
- Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- 3)
- Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA
- 4)
- Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Tokyo 277-8561 Japan
- 5)
- Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto 615-8540, Japan
Abstract
The parametric decay wave (PDW) caused by three-wave parametric decay process was measured in a plasma-injecting X-mode electron cyclotron wave (ECW) from the high field side (HFS) of the Q-shu University Experimental Steady-State Spherical Tokamak (QUEST). The intensity of the low-frequency PDW on the HFS X-mode injection was significantly enhanced over the O-mode ECW injection from the low field side (LFS), where the mode conversion to electron Bernstein wave (EBW) was not expected. As the comparison was executed using plasmas with the same magnetic field and injection power, the wave injection method was considered as the primary cause of the difference in the PDW excitation. The frequency range of the low-frequency PDW was consistent with that of the lower hybrid wave (LHW) range, which was expected to be excited during the mode conversion to EBW. The low-frequency PDW intensity evolved in response to the plasma density, plasma current and injection power. This observation suggests that the low-frequency PDW intensity is a reliable indicator for the efficient mode conversion to EBW.
Keywords
electron Bernstein wave, parametric decay instability, X-B mode conversion, high field side injection, QUEST
Full Text
References
- [1] M. Uchida et al., J. Plasma Fusion Res. 80, 83 (2004).
- [2] K. Hanada et al., Plasma Sci. Technol. 13, 307 (2011).
- [3] H. Idei et al., Nucl. Fusion 57, 126045 (2017).
- [4] R.A. Cairns and C.N. Lashmore-Davies, Phys. Plasmas 7, 4126 (2000).
- [5] M. Uchida et al., EPJ Web Conf. 87, EX/P6-18 (2015).
- [6] A. Pochelon et al., Nucl. Fusion 47, 1552 (2007).
- [7] H.P. Laqua et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 075003 (2003).
- [8] H. Igami et al., EPJ Web Conf. 32, 02006 (2012).
- [9] H. Igami et al., EPJ Web Conf. 203, 02001 (2019).
- [10] S. Shiraiwa et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 185003 (2006).
- [11] A.P. Smirnov et al., Bull Amer. Phys. Soc. 39, 1626 (1994).
- [12] R. Yoneda et al., Plasma Fusion Res. 13, 3402115 (2018).
- [13] V. Shevchenko et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 265005 (2002).
- [14] T. Maekawa et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3783 (2001).
- [15] H. Igami et al., Nucl. Fusion 49, 115005 (2009).
- [16] F.S. McDermott et al., Phys. Fluids 25, 1488 (1982).
- [17] H. Elserafy et al., Plasma Fusion Res. 14, 1205038 (2019).
- [18] H. Igami et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77, 10E931 (2006).
- [19] H. Elserafy et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 62, 035018 (2020).
- [20] H. Idei et al., Proc. 23rd IAEA FEC IAEA-CN-18, EXW/P7-31 (2010).
- [21] T. Yoshinaga et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 125005 (2006).
- [22] M. Ishiguro et al., Phys. Plasmas 19, 062508 (2012).
- [23] A.T. Lin and C.C. Lin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 98 (1981).
- [24] A.J. Cohen and G. Bekefi, Phys. Fluids 14, 1512 (1971).