Plasma and Fusion Research

Volume 7, 2402079 (2012)

Regular Articles


Observation of Low Frequency MHD Mode Driven by Energetic Particles in Large Helical Device Plasmas with Strong Interchange Mode Activities
Wei CHEN1), Mitsutaka ISOBE1,2), Kazuo TOI1,3), Kunihiro OGAWA3), Xiaodi DU2), Masaki OSAKABE1), Satoshi OHDACHI1,2) and LHD Experiment Group
1)
National Institute for Fusion Science, 322-6 Oroshi-cho, Toki 509-5292, Japan
2)
Department of Fusion Science, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, 322-6 Oroshi-cho, Toki 509-5292, Japan
3)
Department of Energy Science and Engineering, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan
(Received 12 December 2011 / Accepted 25 April 2012 / Published 26 July 2012)

Abstract

The beta-induced Alfvén eigenmode (BAE) like modes during strong interchange mode, whose mode-numbers are m/n = 2/1, have been recently observed for the first time in Large Helical Device (LHD). The first harmonic frequencies of these oscillations range from 30 to 70 kHz, much lower than the toroidal-Alfvén-eigenmode (TAE) frequency, and are provided with the same order of the low-frequency gap induced by finite beta effects. The magnetic fluctuation spectrogram indicates that the BAEs often occur in pairs, and their mode-numbers are m/n = 2/1 and −2/−1. The analysis reveals that the modes propagate poloidally and toroidally in opposite directions, and form standing-wave structures in interchange-mode rest frame. The frequencies of the pair mode are associated with the Te/Ti ratio, and the frequency difference of the pair modes is determined by the frequency of interchange mode. The new finding shed light on the underlying physics mechanism for the excitation of the low frequency Alfvénic fluctuation.


Keywords

LHD, BAE, interchange mode, dispersion relation, mode idenfication

DOI: 10.1585/pfr.7.2402079


References

  • [1] A.F. Fasoli et al., Nucl. Fusion 47, S264 (2007).
  • [2] A.F. Fasoli et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 44, B159 (2002).
  • [3] W.W. Heidbrink et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 855 (1993).
  • [4] W. Chen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 185004 (2010).
  • [5] P. Buratti et al., Nucl. Fusion 45, 1446 (2005).
  • [6] W. Chen et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 79, 044501 (2010).
  • [7] O. Zimmermann et al., Proc. 32nd EPS Conf. on PPCF, P4.059 (2005).
  • [8] P. Lauber et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 51, 124009 (2009).
  • [9] C. Nguyen et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 51, 095002 (2009).
  • [10] W. Chen et al., Nucl Fusion 51, 063010 (2011).
  • [11] L. Chen and F. Zonca, Nucl. Fusion 47, S727 (2007).
  • [12] F. Zonca et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 38, 2011 (1996).
  • [13] F. Zonca et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 40, 2009 (1998).
  • [14] F. Zonca et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 48, B15 (2006).
  • [15] M. Isobe et al., Contrib. Plasma Phys. 50, 540 (2010).
  • [16] F. Zonca et al., Nucl. Fusion 49, 085009 (2009).
  • [17] V.S. Marchenko and S.N. Reznik, Nucl. Fusion 49, 022002 (2009).
  • [18] A. Biancalani et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 095002 (2010).
  • [19] A. Botrugno et al., Proc. 37th EPS Conf. on PPCF, P4.110 (2010).

This paper may be cited as follows:

Wei CHEN, Mitsutaka ISOBE, Kazuo TOI, Kunihiro OGAWA, Xiaodi DU, Masaki OSAKABE, Satoshi OHDACHI and LHD Experiment Group, Plasma Fusion Res. 7, 2402079 (2012).