Plasma and Fusion Research
Volume 6, 2405038 (2011)
Regular Articles
- National Institute for Fusion Science, 322-6 Oroshi-cho, Toki 509-5292, Japan
- 1)
- Akita University, 1-1, Gakuen-machi, Tegata, Akita 010-5802, Japan
Abstract
We have proposed the application of a honeycomb-type adsorbent and catalyst for an advanced tritium removal system. Honeycomb-type materials exhibit a much lower pressure drop than pellet-type materials. In this study, the water vapor adsorption properties of various types of honeycomb adsorbents were evaluated using the breakthrough method at a constant flow rate of 307 cm3/min under various temperature and water vapor partial pressure conditions. The results revealed that the adsorption capacity of water vapor on the honeycomb-type zeolite increased with the water vapor partial pressure and the zeolite content of the honeycomb adsorbents. Furthermore, the honeycomb-type zeolite was found to have a higher adsorption rate than the pellet-type zeolite, and the temperature required for regeneration of the honeycomb-type zeolite was at least 450 K. From the viewpoint of practical use, the honeycomb-type adsorbent that contained 50% zeolite with 200 cells per square inch was considered to have superior adsorption properties and a lower pressure drop among a series of honeycomb-type adsorbents.
Keywords
tritium removal system, high throughput, low pressure drop, honeycomb, cell density, zeolite content, water adsorption, molecular sieves, breakthrough curve
Full Text
References
- [1] Radiological control programs for special tritium compounds, DOE-HDBK-1184-2004, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, (2006), p.2.
- [2] Safe handling of tritium: Review of data and experience, Technical Reports Series No. 324, IAEA, Vienna, (1991) p.34.
- [3] S. Tanaka and Y. Yamamoto, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 13, 251 (1976).
- [4] S. Tanaka et al., Fusion Technol. 8, 2196 (1985).
- [5] J.E. Nasise, Proc. Tritium Technology in Fission, Fusion and Isotopic Applications (Dayton, Ohio, Apr. 29-May. 1, 1980) p.347.
- [6] P. Gildea, Fusion Technol. 8, 2505 (1985).
- [7] P. Schirra et al., Fusion Eng. Des. 18, 19 (1991).
- [8] M. Yamada et al., Fusion Technol. 28, 1376 (1995).
- [9] T. Uda et al., Fusion Sci. Technol. 48, 480 (2005).
- [10] T. Uda et al., Fusion Eng. Des. 83, 1715 (2008).
- [11] M. Tanaka et al., Fusion Eng. Des. 84, 1818 (2009).
- [12] T. Wajima et al., Fusion Eng. Des. 85, 1064 (2010).
This paper may be cited as follows:
Masahiro TANAKA, Tatsuhiko UDA and Kenzo MUNAKATA, Plasma Fusion Res. 6, 2405038 (2011).