Plasma and Fusion Research
Volume 3, S1010 (2008)
Regular Articles
- National Institute for Fusion Science, 322-6 Oroshi-cho, Toki 509-5292, Japan
- 1)
- High Temperature Plasma Center, The University of Tokyo, 5-3-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa 277-8568, Japan
Abstract
The coherent MHD oscillation, which consists of the fundamental frequency of several kilohertz and its higher harmonics, (harmonic oscillation: HO) has been observed in Compact Helical System. HO consists of two pairs of harmonic series. One is located in the core region near the ι = 0.5 rational surface (denoted as “HO (core)”), the other is located in the edge region near the ι = 1.0 rational surface (denoted as “HO (edge)”). In the present study, bispectral analysis is applied to the fluctuation data, for which HO is measured by beam emission spectroscopy (BES) and using magnetic probes. The analysis has revealed that fundamental mode of HO in both the magnetic and core density fluctuations have phase correlation with the harmonics including fundamental oscillation, while HO in edge density fluctuation does not have such phase correlation. Mode numbers of HOs are identical for harmonic components having different frequencies, i.e., m/n = -2/1 for HO (core) and m/n = -1/1 for HO (edge). It suggests that the generation of harmonics cannot be interpreted simply as mode coupling because the summation rule for the wavenumber is not satisfied, even though the bicoherence value is significant. The bicoherence value and relative amplitude of higher harmonics correlate with each other, which suggests that bicoherence indicates the degree of distortion of the signals.
Keywords
bispectral analysis, bicoherence, fluctuation, magnetohydrodynamics, edge harmonic oscillation, Compact Helical System, beam emission spectroscopy, edge transport barrier
Full Text
References
- [1] Y.C. Kim and E.J. Powers, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. PS-7, 120 (1979).
- [2] Ch. P. Rits et al., Phys. Fluids B 1, 153 (1989).
- [3] C. Hidalgo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3127 (1993).
- [4] S. Sesnic et al., Nucl. Fusion 34, 1365 (1994).
- [5] D. Raju et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 45, 369 (2003).
- [6] Y. Nagashima et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 095002 (2005).
- [7] T. Oishi et al., Nucl. Fusion 46, 317 (2006).
- [8] T. Oishi et al., Phys. Plasmas 13, 104504 (2006).
- [9] S. Okamura et al., J. Plasma Fusion Res. 79, 977 (2003).
- [10] S. Okamura et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 46, A113 (2004).
- [11] T. Minami et al., Plasma Fusion Res. 1, 032 (2006).
- [12] T. Akiyama et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 48, 1683 (2006).
- [13] M. Takeuchi et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 48, A277 (2006).
- [14] C.M. Greenfield et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4544 (2001).
- [15] W. Suttrop et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 45, 1399 (2003).
- [16] W. Suttrop et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 45, 1399 (2003).
- [17] W. Suttrop et al., Nucl. Fusion 45, 721 (2005).
- [18] T. Oishi et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75, 4118 (2004).
- [19] T. Oishi et al., J. Plasma Fusion Res. SERIES 6, 449 (2004).
- [20] S. Sakakibara et al., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 63, 4406 (1994)
- [21] T. Oishi et al., Plasma Fusion Res. 2, S1097 (2007).
- [22] R.J. Fonck et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 61, 3487 (1990).
- [23] S. Kado et al., J. Nucl. Mat. 363-365, 522 (2007).
- [24] S. Kado et al., 21st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference Proceedings, EX/p8-1 (2006).
This paper may be cited as follows:
Tetsutarou OISHI, Shinichiro KADO, Mikirou YOSHINUMA, Katsumi IDA, Tsuyoshi AKIYAMA, Takashi MINAMI, Kenichi NAGAOKA, Akihiro SHIMIZU, Shoichi OKAMURA and CHS group, Plasma Fusion Res. 3, S1010 (2008).